Abstarct: The architecture of our country is like a treasure trove of a few thousand years, but the efforts made to introduce it have short Background, and today's architect’s community do not consider how to deal with this kind of rich architecture. Unfortunately, this incorrect use led architects to create merely forms or irrational impressions of this architecture, which is a kind of cultural disconnection by itself. The desire to return to Inner personal inherence and to find authentic cultural identities of Iranian architecture requires a proper studying principles that will help architects to have a proper approach to this architecture. Structuralism is a pattern which discovers the frxamework of meaningful cultural phenomena baxsed on linguistics. Structuralists and semioticians exploit the meaningful elements of cultural phenomena and analyze their syntactic relations in order to take the structural analysis under notice and discover linguistic patterns. Since architecture is a cultural issue, it is considered in this ordinance. By a structuralism look to the Iranian architecture patterns, These units can be divided into four elements baxsed on their scale which contains: 1) Elements of materials such as: tile, wood, stone, brick, mortar ... 3) Structural elements such as: floor, wall, ceiling, column, vault, patio ... 2) Spatial elements such as: porch, room , The hall, the vestibule, the dome and ... and finally, the architectural blocks on a city scale like: school, market, mosque, palace and… now, to identify spatial structure of Iranian architecture we choose Spatial elements to analyze to reach langue structure frxamework of this fantastic architecture. The construction of the city of Isfahan, as the utopia of the Safavid government, is baxsed on the verdict and philosophical views of the Isfahan school, and it’s the symbol and embodiment of the spatial structure of its concepts. The Safavid architecture and The Isfahan school in Safavid era, owing to their rich and distinct spatial and structural patterns, can make a way for further structural studies. Now that we are in a situation that the necessity of deep perception of the Iranian past architecture for No one is worn, Knowing these patterns is a way of analyzing the language of this architecture, so if we are concerned about the use of these patterns in design, then a way to face with them is at our disposal. Like any other language that learning its vocabulary structure and its syntax helps the individual to use it according his own perceptions of routine conversation, in the same way, these two levels are also expanded in the Iranian architecture so that designers can analyze langue and discover its roots so as to be able to involve them in their oral parole which is designing. By the way we hope so that analyzing Iranian structuralism study can help architects Take new steps in using the rich Iranian architecture.